Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM

Wang Pengfei

doi:doi:10.11648/j.si.20221005.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM

Wang Pengfei

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 10, Issue 5)

Received: 4 August 2022 Accepted: 15 September 2022 Published: 19 September 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Innovation and entrepreneurship education is an important way for universities to cultivate quality talents to meet the needs of industry and social development, as well as a major element to promote collaborative innovation and new type of industry-education integration among different subjects and regions. In this paper, we analyse the CSSCI literature published by domestic scholars in this field in terms of development stages, publication trends, author and research team strength, research frontiers and trends with the help of Scientific Knowledge Mapping (SKM) software. The results found that, firstly, research in this field has roughly gone through four stages: the nascent period, the rapid growth period, the explosion period and the decline period. Since 2015, a series of policy guidance documents issued by the state have played an obvious role in promoting domestic research in this field; secondly, domestic research in this field has formed a relatively influential research team, with the main positions concentrated in university education research institutions, especially the quantity and quality of literature published by teacher-training universities being in the forefront. In the sample data, 2053 scholars are involved in research in this field, but overall no relatively concentrated cooperative network relationship has been formed, and there is still more room for improving research and cooperation in this field; finally, through keyword co-occurrence network, keyword emergence and cluster analysis mapping, it is concluded that research on ecosystem, collaborative innovation and innovation-driven are the research hot spots in this field. Subject terms such as collaborative education, rooted theory and new engineering have become the frontiers of current research in innovation and entrepreneurship education.

Published in	Science Innovation (Volume 10, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.si.20221005.11
Page(s)	144-152
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Entrepreneurship, Science Knowledge Mapping, Bibliometric Research, Talent Development, Innovative Practices

References

[1]	严玉萍. 基于VPTP的商科大学生创新创业能力培养模式研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2014, 35 (10): 48-52。
[2]	Zhang H, Tsai S B. An Empirical Study on Big Data Model and Visualization of Internet plus Teaching [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 2021.
[3]	Zhang X. Evaluating the Quality of Internet-Based Education in Colleges Using the Regression Algorithm [J]. Mobile Information Systems, 2021, 2021.
[4]	Huang J R, Wang T. Musical wisdom teaching strategy under the internet plus background [J]. journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 40 (2): 3281-3287.
[5]	Li Y L, Zhao M. A Study on the Influencing Factors of Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: UTAUT Model and CCC Moderating Effect [J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12.
[6]	Zhang J H, Shi J J, Liu X, et al. An Intelligent Assessment System of Teaching Competency for Pre-service Teachers Based on AHP-BP Method [J]. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2021, 16 (16): 52-64.
[7]	谢为群, 许烁, 于丽英. 创新创业人才培养质量评价与提升[J]. 中国高校科技, 2019 (11): 41-44。
[8]	Bo Z. Research on Cultivation Scheme Based on TPB of Entrepreneurial Talents in Chinese Local Application-Oriented Universities[J]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 2017, 13 (8): 5629-5636.
[9]	徐向民, 李正, 韦岗, 等. 创新引领战略下的电子信息类专业创新创业人才培养[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018 (02): 153-164。
[10]	赵超, 程铄博, 魏俊美. 基于扎根理论的创新创业教育影响因素研究——大学、企业的视角[J]. 江苏高教, 2020 (12): 52-55。
[11]	Cao Z P, Zhou M. Research on the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Mode in Colleges and Universities Based on Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory [J]. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 2018, 18 (5): 1612-1619.
[12]	Qian H F, Haynes K E. Beyond innovation: the Small Business Innovation Research program as entrepreneurship policy [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2014, 39 (4): 524-543.
[13]	陈磊, 唐桂华, 王秋旺, 等. 新工科背景下能源动力专业大学生交叉创新创业能力培养机制的探索与实践[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2019 (S1): 34-35。
[14]	王志梅, 田启明. 高职院校基于新技术应用的创新创业教育:理念、内涵与实践[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018 (05): 143-148。
[15]	林伟连, 吴伟. 以“IBE”为特色的全链条式创新创业教育体系构建——浙江大学创新创业教育与人才培养实践[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017 (05): 154-157。
[16]	王占仁. 创新创业教育的核心要义与周边关系论析[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报, 2018 (01): 21-26。
[17]	陈静, 王占仁. “内合外联”式高校创业教育生态系统构建研究[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2017 (07): 71-74。
[18]	孔洁珺, 王占仁. 以文化为载体的大学生创业教育实现路径[J]. 中国高等教育, 2019 (10): 43-45。
[19]	黄兆信, 黄扬杰. 创新创业教育质量评价探新——来自全国1231所高等学校的实证研究[J]. 教育研究, 2019, 40 (07): 91-101。
[20]	韩冠爽, 吴术豪, 黄兆信. 新时代大学生创新创业教育发展路径研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2018, 38 (21): 16-18。
[21]	徐小洲, 刘敏. 众创时代下高校创业教育转型发展之道——兼评《众创时代高校创业教育新探索》[J]. 大学教育科学, 2017 (03): 130-131。
[22]	王海花, 杜梅. 数字创新国际研究热点与演化：一个可视化分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38 (21): 152-160。
[23]	Gonzalez-Zamar M D, Abad-Segura E, de la Rosa A L, et al. Digital Education and Artistic-Visual Learning in Flexible University Environments: Research Analysis [J]. Education Sciences, 2020, 10 (11).
[24]	马永斌, 柏喆. 大学创新创业教育的实践模式研究与探索[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2015, 36 (06): 99-103。
[25]	李家华, 卢旭东. 把创新创业教育融入高校人才培养体系[J]. 中国高等教育, 2010 (12): 9-11。
[26]	刘伟. 高校创新创业教育人才培养体系构建的思考[J]. 教育科学, 2011, 27 (05): 64-67。
[27]	孙锐, 孙雨洁. 我国地方创新创业人才引进政策量化研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42 (06): 29-44。
[28]	王占仁. 高校创新创业教育观念变革的整体构想[J]. 中国高教研究, 2015 (07): 75-78。
[29]	王焰新. 高校创新创业教育的反思与模式构建[J]. 中国大学教学, 2015 (04): 4-7。
[30]	王洪才. 创新创业能力的科学内涵及其意义[J]. 教育发展研究, 2022, 42 (01): 53-59。
[31]	熊才平, 戴红斌, 葛军. 教育技术:研究进展及反思[J]. 教育研究, 2018, 39 (03): 118-128。
[32]	王洪才. 创新创业能力培养：作为高质量高等教育的核心内涵[J]. 江苏高教, 2021 (11): 21-27。
[33]	钟志华, 周斌, 蔡三发, 等. 高校创新创业教育组织机构类型与内涵发展[J]. 中国高等教育, 2018 (22): 15-17。
[34]	Del Vecchio P, Secundo G, Mele G, et al. Sustainable entrepreneurship education for circular economy: emerging perspectives in Europe [J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 2021, 27 (8): 2096-2124.
[35]	赵峰, 薛璐婕. 内涵式发展视阙下高校创新创业人才培养研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2018, 36 (04): 73-76。
[36]	Angrisani M, Dell'Anno D, Hockaday T. From ecosystem to community. Combining entrepreneurship and university engagement in an open innovation perspective [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2022, 88 (1): 71-92.
[37]	李亚员, 刘海滨, 孔洁珺. 高校创新创业教育生态系统建设的理想样态——基于4个国家8所典型高校的跨案例比较分析[J]. 高校教育管理, 2022, 16 (02): 32-46。
[38]	陈元媛. 基于生态系统理论的高校创新创业教育研究[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2021 (14): 94-96。
[39]	刘芹良, 解学芳. 创新生态系统理论下众创空间生成机理研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38 (12): 240-247。
[40]	潘吉平. 从特色小镇建设实践看大学生创新创业[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42 (12): 143-153。
[41]	Lehmann E E, Meoli M, Paleari S. Innovation, entrepreneurship and the academic context[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2021, 28 (3): 235-246.
[42]	Canziani B F, Welsh D. How entrepreneurship influences other disciplines: An examination of learning goals [J]. International Journal of Management Education, 2021, 19 (1).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wang Pengfei. (2022). Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM. Science Innovation, 10(5), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wang Pengfei. Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM. Sci. Innov. 2022, 10(5), 144-152. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221005.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wang Pengfei. Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM. Sci Innov. 2022;10(5):144-152. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221005.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20221005.11,
  author = {Wang Pengfei},
  title = {Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {144-152},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20221005.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20221005.11},
  abstract = {Innovation and entrepreneurship education is an important way for universities to cultivate quality talents to meet the needs of industry and social development, as well as a major element to promote collaborative innovation and new type of industry-education integration among different subjects and regions. In this paper, we analyse the CSSCI literature published by domestic scholars in this field in terms of development stages, publication trends, author and research team strength, research frontiers and trends with the help of Scientific Knowledge Mapping (SKM) software. The results found that, firstly, research in this field has roughly gone through four stages: the nascent period, the rapid growth period, the explosion period and the decline period. Since 2015, a series of policy guidance documents issued by the state have played an obvious role in promoting domestic research in this field; secondly, domestic research in this field has formed a relatively influential research team, with the main positions concentrated in university education research institutions, especially the quantity and quality of literature published by teacher-training universities being in the forefront. In the sample data, 2053 scholars are involved in research in this field, but overall no relatively concentrated cooperative network relationship has been formed, and there is still more room for improving research and cooperation in this field; finally, through keyword co-occurrence network, keyword emergence and cluster analysis mapping, it is concluded that research on ecosystem, collaborative innovation and innovation-driven are the research hot spots in this field. Subject terms such as collaborative education, rooted theory and new engineering have become the frontiers of current research in innovation and entrepreneurship education.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM
AU  - Wang Pengfei
Y1  - 2022/09/19
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20221005.11
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 144
EP  - 152
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11
AB  - Innovation and entrepreneurship education is an important way for universities to cultivate quality talents to meet the needs of industry and social development, as well as a major element to promote collaborative innovation and new type of industry-education integration among different subjects and regions. In this paper, we analyse the CSSCI literature published by domestic scholars in this field in terms of development stages, publication trends, author and research team strength, research frontiers and trends with the help of Scientific Knowledge Mapping (SKM) software. The results found that, firstly, research in this field has roughly gone through four stages: the nascent period, the rapid growth period, the explosion period and the decline period. Since 2015, a series of policy guidance documents issued by the state have played an obvious role in promoting domestic research in this field; secondly, domestic research in this field has formed a relatively influential research team, with the main positions concentrated in university education research institutions, especially the quantity and quality of literature published by teacher-training universities being in the forefront. In the sample data, 2053 scholars are involved in research in this field, but overall no relatively concentrated cooperative network relationship has been formed, and there is still more room for improving research and cooperation in this field; finally, through keyword co-occurrence network, keyword emergence and cluster analysis mapping, it is concluded that research on ecosystem, collaborative innovation and innovation-driven are the research hot spots in this field. Subject terms such as collaborative education, rooted theory and new engineering have become the frontiers of current research in innovation and entrepreneurship education.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wang Pengfei

School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wang Pengfei. (2022). Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM. Science Innovation, 10(5), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wang Pengfei. Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM. Sci. Innov. 2022, 10(5), 144-152. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221005.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wang Pengfei. Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM. Sci Innov. 2022;10(5):144-152. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20221005.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20221005.11,
  author = {Wang Pengfei},
  title = {Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {144-152},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20221005.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20221005.11},
  abstract = {Innovation and entrepreneurship education is an important way for universities to cultivate quality talents to meet the needs of industry and social development, as well as a major element to promote collaborative innovation and new type of industry-education integration among different subjects and regions. In this paper, we analyse the CSSCI literature published by domestic scholars in this field in terms of development stages, publication trends, author and research team strength, research frontiers and trends with the help of Scientific Knowledge Mapping (SKM) software. The results found that, firstly, research in this field has roughly gone through four stages: the nascent period, the rapid growth period, the explosion period and the decline period. Since 2015, a series of policy guidance documents issued by the state have played an obvious role in promoting domestic research in this field; secondly, domestic research in this field has formed a relatively influential research team, with the main positions concentrated in university education research institutions, especially the quantity and quality of literature published by teacher-training universities being in the forefront. In the sample data, 2053 scholars are involved in research in this field, but overall no relatively concentrated cooperative network relationship has been formed, and there is still more room for improving research and cooperation in this field; finally, through keyword co-occurrence network, keyword emergence and cluster analysis mapping, it is concluded that research on ecosystem, collaborative innovation and innovation-driven are the research hot spots in this field. Subject terms such as collaborative education, rooted theory and new engineering have become the frontiers of current research in innovation and entrepreneurship education.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Hotspots and Evolution Visualization Analysis of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Based on SKM
AU  - Wang Pengfei
Y1  - 2022/09/19
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20221005.11
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 144
EP  - 152
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20221005.11
AB  - Innovation and entrepreneurship education is an important way for universities to cultivate quality talents to meet the needs of industry and social development, as well as a major element to promote collaborative innovation and new type of industry-education integration among different subjects and regions. In this paper, we analyse the CSSCI literature published by domestic scholars in this field in terms of development stages, publication trends, author and research team strength, research frontiers and trends with the help of Scientific Knowledge Mapping (SKM) software. The results found that, firstly, research in this field has roughly gone through four stages: the nascent period, the rapid growth period, the explosion period and the decline period. Since 2015, a series of policy guidance documents issued by the state have played an obvious role in promoting domestic research in this field; secondly, domestic research in this field has formed a relatively influential research team, with the main positions concentrated in university education research institutions, especially the quantity and quality of literature published by teacher-training universities being in the forefront. In the sample data, 2053 scholars are involved in research in this field, but overall no relatively concentrated cooperative network relationship has been formed, and there is still more room for improving research and cooperation in this field; finally, through keyword co-occurrence network, keyword emergence and cluster analysis mapping, it is concluded that research on ecosystem, collaborative innovation and innovation-driven are the research hot spots in this field. Subject terms such as collaborative education, rooted theory and new engineering have become the frontiers of current research in innovation and entrepreneurship education.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download